watch the FLOMM trailer!
@FLOMMUS threads! FLOMM instagram! FLOMM facebook! buy us a coffee

THE BATTLE FOR MODeRN 1923


  chunks of flommus 

SUBSCRIBE!  FEEDLY     RSS     EMAIL 

guilt is good’

Yes­ter­day, on Moth­er’s day, I like to dwell on the fact that my own was a train wreck. If you had a won­der­ful Moth­er – how lucky you are. Not all moth­ers are gen­er­ous, not all moth­ers are good. Be­cause I’m not alone in this – 

I’m “out” about it.

I’m rub­bing my thumb and in­dex fin­ger to­geth­er, play­ing a tiny vi­o­lin. Be­cause my moth­er cried every day of her life, and I was her con­stant com­pan­ion and solo wit­ness, I’m averse to ex­treme dis­plays of emotion.

Putting one’s tragedies on show is re­pel­lent to me. Again, we’re not stay­ing here – and yet, here we are.

Guilt is Good.” —Ruth Frank Rosenwald
ruth ro͞oTH/
nounarchaic
noun: ruth – a feel­ing of pity, dis­tress, or grief.

She did the best she could. I was fed, cared for and clothed.

In the ’60s, to protest the Viet­nam War she went on hunger strikes, and threat­ened to set her­self on fire. You know how it is. Self-im­mo­la­tion was a no­ble trend at the time in the Bud­dhist Monk Com­mu­ni­ty, but in the “Moms-from-my-Mid­dle-School” Com­mu­ni­ty, it was pret­ty much frowned upon. See photo.

Ruth

In 1939, my mother’s moth­er, Lau­ra Per­ley Frank, com­mit­ted sui­cide. I know lit­tle about Lau­ra ex­cept that she was di­a­bet­ic, en­joyed a game of mah-jongg, and was a fan­tas­tic cook. Her spe­cial­ty was pas­try, which she couldn’t eat be­cause of her med­ical con­di­tion. I as­sume that she was bipo­lar, al­though I don’t re­al­ly un­der­stand the term. I guess I ought to by now. Ruth was nineteen.

Ruth’s own emo­tion­al in­sta­bil­i­ty was ev­i­dent from an even ear­li­er age. I re­mem­ber her telling me that her trou­bles stemmed from the quandary, “Where does thought it­self come from?” but I don’t see why that should dri­ve you par­tic­u­lar­ly crazy.

In her 20s, af­ter a few sui­ci­dal “episodes” Ruth spent some qual­i­ty time in a men­tal hos­pi­tal, where drugs and shock treat­ments were ad­min­is­tered to her while strait­jack­et­ed. Un­der­stand­ably, this ex­pe­ri­ence caused a life­long mis­trust of psy­chotrop­ic drugs, as well as per­ma­nent in­jury to her shoul­ders, which would dis­lo­cate un­der stress­ful sit­u­a­tions, of which there were plen­ty. In the 90s I fi­nal­ly got her to try Prozac, but she quit af­ter a few days, claim­ing the pop­u­lar­i­ty of the drug sig­naled a con­spir­a­cy by the “old boy’s club” — the A.M.A. — to keep women down. I’m con­vinced the new S.S.R.I. drugs could have helped her im­mense­ly. But Ruth didn’t want to be healthy or hap­py. She want­ed pity. And you can’t help some­one who just wants pity. It took me a life­time to fig­ure that one out.

Lau­ra and Ruth’s re­la­tion­ship was dis­tant. And Laura’s end so trag­ic. So why did my moth­er name me Lau­rie? Is it ad­vis­able to pay homage to a sui­cide? Who does this? Cer­tain­ly not the Jews. No­body. When I con­front­ed my moth­er with the ques­tion, she be­came up­set, de­fend­ing her choice as a nat­ur­al one. Then again, up­set was my mother’s nat­ur­al sta­tus. She ex­plained, by her twist­ed lights, that Lau­ra was the sad, bad Lau­ra, and I, Lau­rie, was go­ing to be the hap­py, good Lau­ra. Thus, from birth, I had a job – to give the love and sup­port to my moth­er that she nev­er got from hers, the bad Lau­ra. A big job for a baby. One I could nev­er quit.

So what hap­pened to snap­shot Ruthie, the fun-lov­ing, beer swill­ing, low-cut beat­nik babe that shacked up in Harlem with that “crazy” sculp­tor cat? Ruth was a su­perb beau­ty. The cat’s pa­ja­mas. The liv­ing end. I don’t know why she couldn’t en­joy it.

There are only two types of women: God­dess­es and door­mats.” —Pi­cas­so

Un­true, say I. Ruth was nei­ther – she was a proud vir­gin, what­ev­er my ex­is­tence may prove. When one —— threat­ened her mar­riage, Ruth didn’t stay and fight. My naïve and in­no­cent moth­er was so hurt and shocked by this at­trac­tion that she pushed Bob away. Adul­tery was un­think­able, in her nun-like mind. In fact, I re­mem­ber her telling me that, for her, as a lover, only the good­ness of Je­sus would do. It was all or noth­ing. Ruth, ever the dra­ma queen, chose noth­ing, and end­ed up with just that.

As an ugly woman, one who would have made the most of the gift of beau­ty, this sure does dis­turb me. What a waste. With her good looks, I would have slut­ted it up, with great rel­ish and contentment.

As a di­vorcee, Ruth’s looks be­came a li­a­bil­i­ty. She want­ed to be adored for some oth­er, lofti­er rea­son, not be­cause she was gor­geous and stacked. She was pos­sessed by a pas­sion­ate prud­ish­ness fu­eled by hurt and rage. Af­ter Bob’s treach­ery she couldn’t trust any man. She nev­er re­mar­ried, though she had plen­ty of chances. She dat­ed the hand­some African Amer­i­can ac­tor Dick Gre­go­ry. Sascha the world­ly Russ­ian in­vit­ed her to vis­it his di­a­mond mines in Tan­za­nia. The pop­u­lar talk show host David Susskind at­tacked her in a row­boat on Cen­tral Park Lake. Young ——, the sen­si­tive artist, wrote her fer­vent love let­ters from Italy. In blood. Long let­ters. Ugh. Ruth seemed to at­tract pas­sion­ate nut jobs of every un­even stripe. In Con­necti­cut, hunky —— barked like a dog. How I de­spised him! When —— pro­posed, it may well have been me who scotched the deal. At ten, I was wear­ing the pants. Some­times, they were cu­lottes. Some­times, pedal-pushers.

I have a the­o­ry that many weak and needy peo­ple get what they want through the qui­et, de­vi­ous pow­er of do­ing noth­ing. Oth­ers show up to fill in the blanks. My moth­er can­ni­ly used the awe­some method of help­less­ness. I stepped up – up to a point. And not for­ev­er. I hope she found Peace in some kind of af­ter­life, be­cause when she was alive, she suf­fered, and it was War.
 

—lau­rie rosenwald

Flom­mist Lau­rie Rosen­wald is an Amer­i­can il­lus­tra­tor, au­thor, artist, and de­sign­er. Copy­right © 2016 Lau­rie Rosenwald.

read en l’ordre cronológi­co

· · ·  a pre­vi­ous post
A NEXT POST  • • •
sub­se­cuente

shar­ing ist nice



PLEASE   SUPPORT   FLOMM
TIPS  +  DONATIONS  DISCREETLY  ACCEPTED

FLOMM
promotes learning  +  education worldwide
drawing attention to works by nü  +  upcoming artists,
designers, writers, musicians  +  MOR

OUR INVOLVEMENT
– however –
is mostly paid for out of pocket or in trade

IF YOU ENJOY
wat  FLOMM  is doing here, please consider


1.   LEAVE US A TIP  :
use our tip jar whenever the mood hits



2.   BUY OUR SWAG  :
our approach is semi-green —
                all our  FLOMMHAUS  merch is made to order




3.   HELP US OUT  :
use our hashtags  #flomm  #flommus  #whereisflomm  #nüflommart  #flommist
when posting on ur socials —
or drop us a note and offer to help in some way
everything we do is on a volunteer basis —
             when we say  YOU CAN BE A FLOMMIST TOO  this is wat we mean


THANK YOU
your support helps our continued efforts
to create content across numerous platforms

clic 「 HIER   」 to return to the DER TUNG front page

 

 

 
Der Tung
Posted
Mon 9 May 2016

    FLOMM is   an educational MODERN ART movement   •  art history resource
                                                         •  that promotes learning thru nü  • •  alternative medía  • • •

FLOMM is a Trademark of Steve Mehallo, Sacramento California USA. Copyright © Steve Mehallo. Call the FLOMM Answering Machine at +1 (916) 741 2394. FLOMM IS A SUPPORTER OF NON-VIOLENT ARTS EDUCATION.

flomm social media may contain explicit content foul language, questionable ideas, and art


    Contact:

    Required*