watch the FLOMM trailer!
@FLOMMUS twitter! FLOMM instagram! FLOMM facebook! buy us a coffee

THE BATTLE FOR MODeRN 1923


  chunks of flommus 

SUBSCRIBE!  FEEDLY     RSS     EMAIL 

bring your bullhorns, we’re marching: meet me at the intersection of #mahsaamini and dobbs

Among the many chal­lenges West­ern women faced in the post-911 world was the weaponiza­tion of the op­pres­sion of Mus­lim women against us. It is not only a moral im­per­a­tive for West­ern fem­i­nists to sup­port women’s lib­er­a­tion in Iran, their lib­er­a­tion is in­ex­tri­ca­bly linked to our own.

Ten­sions are run­ning high among women in Amer­i­ca as we try to make sense of how we got here, what con­se­quences we have yet to see, and how to clean up the mess in front of us.

When the leaked Dobbs rul­ing came down, our col­lec­tive burnout shift­ed to a rage whose qui­et depths we have not even be­gun to ex­plore. We’ve tak­en to the streets. We’ve marched. We’re vot­ing in record num­bers. We’re not sure of the fu­ture, but one thing is clear:

A rad­i­cal re­li­gious fac­tion of our gov­ern­ment is tak­ing the first steps to­ward im­ple­ment­ing an au­to­crat­ic regime.

On the oth­er side of the plan­et, women who lost their rights 43 years ago to one are de­mand­ing a new gov­ern­ment. Here’s why West­ern women should care.

On March 7, 1979, Ay­a­tol­lah Khome­i­ni, one of the ar­chi­tects of the cur­rent op­pres­sive regime in Iran, an­nounced that it would be manda­to­ry in Iran for girls and women to wear hi­jab. The an­nounce­ment was met with shock, as even con­ser­v­a­tive sup­port­ers of the Ay­a­tol­lah and the Is­lam­ic Re­pub­li­can Par­ty were op­posed to manda­to­ry hi­jab. The next day, over 100,000 un­veiled women and their al­lies gath­ered in the streets of Tehran, the cap­i­tal city of Iran to protest.

Al­though pro­tes­tors were at­tacked by mobs of con­ser­v­a­tive counter-pro­tes­tors that hurled stones, knives, and slurs at them, they were ini­tial­ly suc­cess­ful at re­peal­ing the manda­to­ry hi­jab. The Is­lam­ic Re­pub­lic how­ev­er would not back down and un­leashed a suc­cess­ful wave of ter­ror against Lib­er­als, the Left, and women across the coun­try.

By July 1981, manda­to­ry hi­jab was once again the law of the land. By 1983, the regime in­tro­duced cor­po­re­al pun­ish­ment of up to 74 lash­es for un­veiled women.

Since then, the vi­o­lence to­ward un­veiled women has only got­ten worse, even­tu­al­ly lead­ing to the killings of young women like Mah­sa Ami­ni (Zhi­na Ami­ni) for a false charge of in­cor­rect­ly wear­ing her hi­jab.

West­ern fem­i­nists stood in sol­i­dar­i­ty with Iran­ian women back then, there was even an at­tempt to cre­ate an in­ter­na­tion­al body to sup­port them. How­ev­er, as the en­er­gy of the Civ­il Rights era gave way to Wall Street and the era of “greed is good,” the fo­cus of fem­i­nists on this side of the world shift­ed to more press­ing mat­ters at home. How­ev­er, as we en­ter the post-Dobbs era, we are see­ing the same movie play out in front of us.

Like the con­ser­v­a­tive women in Iran were shocked to watch the par­ty they sup­port­ed turn against them, so do Amer­i­can Re­pub­li­can women feel be­trayed.

They have been ap­palled that a move­ment they saw as a way to pro­tect the un­born has played out as a means to op­press women. Re­pub­li­can leg­is­la­tures across the coun­try are con­tin­u­ing to in­tro­duce wild­ly bru­tal bills that fine, im­prison, and in some cas­es, ex­e­cute women for hav­ing an abor­tion.

Some of these dra­con­ian laws have al­ready passed. Oth­ers are be­ing chal­lenged in the courts.

To tell the full sto­ry though, we need to step back 20 years pri­or, to the post-911 era.

On 911, al-Qae­da, a rad­i­cal Mus­lim ter­ror­ist or­ga­ni­za­tion launched the most suc­cess­ful ter­ror at­tack on Unit­ed States soil. In the af­ter­math, America’s post-Cold War sense of self was shat­tered.

The threats we only ever saw flick­er­ing on our screens in far­away places like Iran were now in front of us. In the haze of anger and fear, the Bush Ad­min­is­tra­tion launched two deeply mis­guid­ed wars. To gain pop­u­lar sup­port for those wars, we leaned into the worst of our foun­da­tion­al be­hav­iors and “oth­ered” Mus­lims.

Is­lama­pho­bic at­tacks and hate crimes sky­rock­et­ed across the coun­try as talk­ing heads de­scribed Mus­lims as peo­ple who hat­ed free­dom and hat­ed us “for our free­dom”. One of the most suc­cess­ful tac­tics of Is­lam­o­pho­bic pro­pa­gan­da dur­ing the time was the ag­gres­sive fo­cus on the mis­treat­ment of women in op­pres­sive theo­crat­ic regimes like Iran.

Every politi­cian and talk­ing head push­ing for the il­le­gal in­va­sion of Iraq would re­peat the same talk­ing point:

Mus­lims are bar­barous, look at how they abuse their women.”

This talk­ing point was re­peat­ed ad nau­se­am to the de­gree that we all be­lieved that the worst place to live in the world as a woman was any Mus­lim-dom­i­nant coun­try.

Sta­tis­tics say oth­er­wise.
So do Mus­lim women.
So does the Quran.
None of those truths mat­tered un­for­tu­nate­ly as the pow­er­ful had cre­at­ed a very ef­fec­tive tool. The nar­ra­tive sur­round­ing the abuse and op­pres­sion of women was not only weaponized as a jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for war but as a way to fur­ther strip West­ern women of their rights.

The most ob­vi­ous ex­am­ple of this can be seen in the anti-hi­jab laws in the West. The pro­po­nents of these bans ar­gue that al­low­ing hi­jab erodes their cul­ture. The slight­est bit of scruti­ny shows this ar­gu­ment to be a ridicu­lous false­hood be­cause why isn’t the thobe or the kufi banned? Why aren’t his­tor­i­cal ar­ti­facts from oth­er coun­tries banned from their mu­se­ums? We know the an­swer and West­ern women should ex­er­cise cau­tion sup­port­ing any laws that po­lice the at­tire of oth­er women. Lest those laws be then turned against your style of dress.
 

In­jus­tice any­where is a threat to jus­tice every­where. We are caught in an in­escapable net­work of mu­tu­al­i­ty, tied in a sin­gle gar­ment of des­tiny. What­ev­er af­fects one di­rect­ly, af­fects all in­di­rect­ly.”
Dr. Mar­tin Luther King
 

This Is­lam­o­pho­bic pro­pa­gan­da was a very pow­er­ful tool when wield­ed against West­ern fem­i­nism. Calls for fur­ther gen­der equal­i­ty in the West were in­evitably met with charges of en­ti­tle­ment or in­grat­i­tude.

The ac­cess to the min­i­mal­ly ba­sic rights we en­joyed in the West was mea­sured against op­pres­sive laws like the manda­to­ry hi­jab in Iran. These most­ly man­i­fest­ed as veiled threats that em­pha­sized that the rights we ex­pe­ri­enced were mere priv­i­leges be­cause West­ern men were bet­ter kind of men than brutish Mus­lim men.

Pay eq­ui­ty?
We were lucky we could work at all.
Bod­i­ly au­ton­o­my?
We were lucky we could dance in the streets.
More pro­tec­tions against ha­rass­ment?
We were lucky we could legal­ly leave the house alone.

In fact, we were lucky we weren’t go­ing to be be­head­ed in an hon­or killing (ig­nore the oth­er ways we’d be killed of course).

The most in­sid­i­ous lines? It was that it was our duty to lib­er­ate Mus­lim women. For Chris­t­ian women, this meant con­ver­sion. For the non-re­li­gious, it meant putting aside do­mes­tic move­ments to sup­port West­ern in­ter­ven­tion to “help” these women.

The worst part was it worked.

Women’s rights in the West paused and are now, as we see with Dobbs, cur­rent­ly re­gress­ing. Rad­i­cal right-wing op­por­tunists saw their chance and cap­i­tal­ized on the di­ver­sion. Lead­ing us to re­cent­ly, where a ma­jor­i­ty, though slim, of White women vot­ed for Don­ald Trump, an open misog­y­nist and the ar­chi­tect of the Supreme Court that over­turned our rights. Most­ly iden­ti­fy­ing as Chris­t­ian con­ser­v­a­tives, it’s not a sur­prise that 58% of Trump sup­port­ers have an “un­fa­vor­able” view of Is­lam.

For West­ern women first see­ing the pow­er of Iran­ian women in the move­ment, it is pro­found. Their courage, re­silience, and hero­ism are in­cred­i­bly in­spir­ing. These im­ages were even sur­pris­ing for some con­sid­er­ing the dom­i­nant nar­ra­tives of sub­mis­sion around Mus­lim women. Though it is no won­der we are ig­no­rant of them as our cul­tures have been cut off from one an­oth­er since the ear­ly days of the Iran­ian Rev­o­lu­tion. So the only thing many of us know is the post-911 Is­lam­o­pho­bia pro­pa­gan­da.

How­ev­er, see­ing young women like Hadis Na­jafi’s brav­ery in the face of moral­i­ty po­lice who took her life, we see what we most hope we are.

In Hadis, we see the women we hope we can be when we take on the Dobbs rul­ing and fight to re­store our rights.

Most no­tably though, see­ing the true strength, de­ter­mi­na­tion, and sac­ri­fice of Iran­ian women in the name of hu­man rights breaks the false nar­ra­tives about who they are and what they face. It in­stead lifts a mir­ror to our­selves in the West and we see our re­flec­tion. We see how our fates are in­ter­twined.

Their op­pres­sion is our op­pres­sion. Their lib­er­a­tion is our lib­er­a­tion.

It is time for West­ern women to stand up in sol­i­dar­i­ty with Iran­ian women.

Want to sup­port the lib­er­a­tion move­ment in Iran? It’s easy. All they’ve asked of us is to “Be our voice.” Talk about what’s hap­pen­ing with the peo­ple in your life. Con­tact your gov­ern­ment rep­re­sen­ta­tives and tell them no nu­clear deal with Iran un­til there is a new regime. Share and up­lift the voic­es of Iran­ian women and their al­lies on so­cial me­dia.

Use your voice un­til there is change. It’s more pow­er­ful than you think.

 

—na­tal­ie michelle

Flom­mist Na­tal­ie Michelle does­n’t have a bio. She just rants. Copy­right © 2022 Na­tal­ie Michelle.

read en l’ordre cronológi­co

· · ·  a pre­vi­ous post
A NEXT POST  • • •
sub­se­cuente

shar­ing ist nice



PLEASE   SUPPORT   FLOMM
TIPS  +  DONATIONS  DISCREETLY  ACCEPTED

FLOMM
promotes learning  +  education worldwide
drawing attention to works by nü  +  upcoming artists,
designers, writers, musicians  +  MOR

OUR INVOLVEMENT
– however –
is mostly paid for out of pocket or in trade

IF YOU ENJOY
wat  FLOMM  is doing here, please consider


1.   LEAVE US A TIP  :
use our tip jar whenever the mood hits



2.   BUY OUR SWAG  :
our approach is semi-green —
                all our  FLOMMHAUS  merch is made to order




3.   HELP US OUT  :
use our hashtags  #flomm  #flommus  #whereisflomm  #nüflommart  #flommist
when posting on ur socials —
or drop us a note and offer to help in some way
everything we do is on a volunteer basis —
             when we say  YOU CAN BE A FLOMMIST TOO  this is wat we mean


THANK YOU
your support helps our continued efforts
to create content across numerous platforms

clic 「 HIER   」 to return to the DER TUNG front page

 

 

 
Der Tung
Posted
Thu 6 Oct 2022

    FLOMM is   an educational MODERN ART movement   •  art history resource
                                                         •  that promotes learning thru nü  • •  alternative medía  • • •

FLOMM is a Trademark of Steve Mehallo, Sacramento California USA. Copyright © Steve Mehallo. Call the FLOMM Answering Machine at +1 (916) 741 2394. FLOMM IS A SUPPORTER OF NON-VIOLENT ARTS EDUCATION.

flomm social media may contain explicit content foul language, questionable ideas, and art


    Contact:

    Required*