packaging babes

Can we fuck­ing stop al­ready with plus sized mod­els?

Why can’t all mod­els just be called   mod­els   ?

At best,
plus size cap­i­tal­izes off the out­rage of women at im­pos­si­ble beau­ty stan­dards – ba­si­cal­ly mak­ing mon­ey off the psy­cho­log­i­cal dam­age the mod­el­ing in­dus­try has caused –

At worst,
it con­tin­ues to per­pet­u­ate the idea that these women are still some­how not a nor­mal size,

                  they are dif­fer­ent,
                  they are plus,
                  and there­fore go into a dif­fer­ent cat­e­go­ry
                  (imag­ine me hard eye­rolling at all of this).
 

Look, mar­ket­ing jerks,
all we re­al­ly need from mod­els is for them to be babes and babes come in a va­ri­ety of pack­ag­ing:
                  Ash­ley Gra­ham is a babe.
                  Kate Up­ton is a babe.
                  Geena Ro­cero is a babe.

I en­joy look­ing at all of these women,

you don’t have to put them in
                  sep­a­rate cat­e­gories,

just keep it di­verse so we can all be rep­re­sent­ed and con­nect with your brand.

It’s not fuck­ing rock­et sci­ence.
 

—na­tal­ie michelle

Flom­mist Na­tal­ie Michelle does­n’t have a bio. She just rants. Copy­right © 2016 Na­tal­ie Michelle. Pic­tured: Mod­el Ash­ley Gra­ham by James Macari for Sports Il­lus­trat­ed, Copy­right © 2016 Time Inc.

MOR D’ARTÍCULOS  MOR FLOMM !

READ SOME  RELATED  DER TUNG  POSTS  :

chom­sky, fou­cault mo­ment about those big­ots so sick can­not un­see con­ceiv­able vic­to­ries em­brac­ing and cap­i­tal­iz­ing are two dif­fer­ent things that kind of guy you could get a beer with go­ing to the club