amendment, first

This is the First Amend­ment of the Con­sti­tu­tion of the Unit­ed States:

“Con­gress shall make no law re­spect­ing an es­tab­lish­ment of re­li­gion, or pro­hibit­ing the free ex­er­cise there­of; or abridg­ing the free­dom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the peo­ple peace­ably to as­sem­ble, and to pe­ti­tion the gov­ern­ment for a re­dress of griev­ances.”

No­tice it doesn’t give any pro­tec­tions for your speech against pri­vate cit­i­zens.

Thus, Trump’s speech is pro­tect­ed from gov­ern­ment cen­sor­ship by the Con­sti­tu­tion, it is not pro­tect­ed from pri­vate cit­i­zens. In fact, it ac­tu­al­ly pro­tects Trump’s pro­tes­tors.

So the “his first amend­ment rights” is a bull­shit ar­gu­ment. Try again.

My oth­er fa­vorite is “what if pro­test­ers shut down a Bernie ral­ly?” Bros, they did. Twice. Two times. Both times he let them speak, took their con­cerns to heart, and in­cor­po­rat­ed their needs into his cam­paign. So try again.

Also

To­day, I down­loaded two dif­fer­ent goal set­ting apps and nei­ther will open. I GET IT LIFE.
 

—na­tal­ie michelle

Flom­mist Na­tal­ie Michelle does­n’t have a bio. She just rants. Copy­right © 2016 Na­tal­ie Michelle. Im­age: CNN.

MOR D’ARTÍCULOS  MOR FLOMM !

READ SOME  RELATED  DER TUNG  POSTS  :

ide­al econ­o­my ‘we want our coun­try back!’ align­ment bernie: ‘trai­tor’ – ? now in charge of ed­u­ca­tion kar­ma only due to ne­science protest: we will not tol­er­ate tyran­ny elec­tion talk with my dad